Homo sapiens sapiens, that's our latin scientific name, meaning "the man who knows that he knows." But what does he know exactly? Not much. Because he quickly forget those who lived before him.

Like Tintin's Unicorn

If we give credit to historians, human memory wouldn't exceed 3000 years.That is a lot under the score. As we'll see later on, some of our mythic memories are dozens of thousand years old, or even more.  Before that, it's the blackhole. The ignorance wall. Recently, thanks to DNA, man can know a bit more about him.  And about where he comes from.See La loi d'oubli Science keep silent. Loudly. Elsewhere, philosophies, mythologies and religions give different answers. Like Tintin with the scrolls of parchmentsRead 'The Secret Of The Unicorn', by Herge let's try to superpose them all, so that we can see the secret message showing through.

What does science think about the delicate question of our origins? "The dinosaurs' disparition, 65 million years ago, opens way to the development of mammals. Biped primates appeared 3 million years ago. First, Homo habilis, our  older ancestor,Is-he really our ancestor? See Neandertal by clicking on +  estimated 3 million years old, is located in Africa. He's followed by Homo erectus, who emigrated to Asia 2 million years ago... More patience is required, and around 500 000 years ago, all the fossils foundNot all of them actuelly. For some fossils that didn't fit the theory were happily lost… are in a way of "sapientization": Homo erectus evolves into modern man.

150,000 years ago, Homo sapiens appeared in Africa, then in Asia 100 000 years ago, then in Europe 40,000 years ago: it's Cro-Magnon man. He few by few supplanted archaic Hominidae species, like Homo sapiens neandertalensis."Click on + below  (source)wikipedia Here is the official speech that the majority of scientists have been stood up for for at least a century. Yet, exceptions are not missing: here and there, some human fossils far more ancientClick > and go to How Old Are We? contradict that theory.

Scientists Don't Care

To them, nothing can call the main theory into question. Those exceptions are called by them: singularities. A wonderful scientific invention to mask the weaknesses of a dogmatic theory. If there are only a few exception to the rule, it is accepted. But when the number of exceptions exceeds the number of facts defended by the theory, they are no longer singularities, the theory must be revised. It is happening now, in numerous science fields. But chiefly in the evolution field.

And yet, neo-darwiniansSee L'évolution en question still stand up for it. That's the last straw for evolutionists, that refusal to evolve!

In 19th century,  Charles DarwinSee Dépasser Darwin proposed his theory about evolution, in which we are cousins of apes.See the link between man and animal, click on L'animal homme With time, that model became a dogma, and then it became the "absolute truth". "When a paleo-anthropologist finds a Homo sapiens fossil, he doesn't dare giving it more than 150 000 years of age, even if the layer where he found it is far older."  (source)  Out of cowardness or realism, young researchers learn fast how to think like the  old scientists.Not all of them, luckily! Click on + below

Darwin's Dogma

Up to the point that the most widespread datation method consists in comparing the fossil with those from the books, and deducing for it a corresponding age. A scandalous practice, totally non-scientific. Claude Bernard must be turning in his grave. Lots of points of the official scientific doctrine are contentious.See Ruine de l'âme All the fossils aren't approved unanimously. Some questionable datationsSee Trop vieux pour être vrai can't always exclude Homo sapiens' existence at more ancient dates.Click on + below

But darwinism is no more a hypothesis, nor a theory, it became a dogma for science. And not only that: it follows the outlines of the main, ultra-liberal economy. How such a situation could disturb the scientific mechanism so that it goes the wrong way round? How can we allow searchers to follow their tracks without suffering ideological pressures? However that may be, fans of infallible science should put another record on. Science is human made, its limits are those of this imperfect world.

When science becomes a sect, it loses its soul.See Science In Danger And all those who follow it blindly contribute to its ruin.