The dawn of the official history is replete with ready-made civilizationsGo to Civilisations tombées du ciel with a high degree of culture and development but without any past nor evolution. Who could admit that a sophisticated and refined civilization can emerge from nothing? Historians. And Emmanuel Kant.

Why deny the obvious? Many civilizationsGo to Mondes disparus have preceded ours. We are dwarfs on the shoulders of giants.Go to La loi d'oubli Regarding the creation of manGo to La création de l'homme whose myths are about, it has not been made ex nihilo, from nothing. Our creators had good groundingGo to Nos pères créateurs for the creation of man, at least according to the sacred texts,Which are all bottles with messages in the ocean of time. Go to Le testament des dieux all of them, no matter their nature or their origin. So what was this good grounding to create Man? Simply the preexisting elohimOr super human, we might say ... Go to page genetic inheritance, that was just modifiedGo to L'homme OGM by them.

Nothing is created from scratch. Does this mean that the former men have not been created, like we have? Are they, as claimed by the theory of evolution,Go to Dépasser Darwin the final outcome of a long evolution that goes back to amoeba? Or are they, as told by the esoteric tradition, beings of light materialized by their own intention? "Before being born of woman, we have come from light, from the place where light is born of its own will, and the light is reflected through us." (source)

Settling this difficult question would make us go back too far in the past, since, according to the most recent archaeological and palaeo-anthropological discoveries, the origin of the so-called modern human species would easily go back to one million years ago.Go to La vérité sur notre âge Some artifacts would even date back to dinosaurs!Go to Trop vieux pour être vrai As for the sudden appearance of advanced civilizationsYou can incidentally see a strange one in Thirteen Crystal Skulls suddenly sprung from a sea of primitive savagery,Go to L'effet Mad Max who could believe in it?

Who could? The philosopher Immanuel Kant.Königsberg, 1724-1804 Very seriously, as usual, this venerable german thinker said: "Logic has come achieved and accomplishedgeschlossen und vollendet from the mind of Aristotle." It is true that the Greek thinker is the father of both logic and metaphysics. In any case, it was given his name. Since the treaty came after his work on physics, Aristotle called it "which comes after physics."ta meta ta phusica He did not name it according to the decreasing order of his best treaties, but to the order in which he wrote them.

This does not mean Aristotle has invented this discipline. He simply rediscovered itLike wheel in America was invented by the Olmecs, and forgotten thereafter. It is the same for logic. Today, we see him as the oldest author in this field. But that does not mean he was the first. The ancient Greeks did not come straight from caves and monkeys climbing trees. There were many civilizations before them, even though we forgot them nowadays. Logic has been identified and understood by humans long before ancient Greece.Without logic, how could they have built the pyramids, for example? How could they have directed them so perfectly? How could they have respected such an impressive regularity in their construction?

"These are not the beings that actually exist, but the ideas," said Marcel Proust. The idea of logic was there before the Greek brain who found it. It is as old as languageWhich was a logic creation, as demonstrated by Ferdinand de Saussure. Assuming that Aristotle did not read anything on this issue , heard nothing neither in the Celt nor in the Egyptian traditions, so he picked up the whole matter in the general store called Akashic Records,Go to page which is another way to designate inspiration. You can also say that it comes from the Muses. Or, in the language of Nagual, that it is a gift of Energy coming through Will.

You can also say that it is imagination that gives us a helping hand to shuffle the deck. However you say it, it is a fact. Man is, at best, a channel through which are embodied the DreamGo to le temps du Rêve and the past of mankind. Each of us is inspired by precursors, Aristotle does not escape the rule. Neither does Kant. Really? But God created man ex nihilo, from nothing. Bullshit! He has only manipulated his own DNA a bit to shape a body similar to Him. "God created man in His image."

Nothing Comes From Nothing

However, Athena ... What's wrong with Athena? She came fully armed out of Zeus' head. Achieved and accomplished, she was. With her helmet and her aegis.Shield. Well, this is what they say. Go to Le foudre et le feu Talk about painless childbirth! Athena is the proof that you can be born out of nothingness. Wait, you are mistaken. Athena was born by cloning. She was born adultThat is what 'fully armed' means from the artificial matrix. And ZeusBesides Zeus and God correspond to only one Greek word, theos is not the progenitor, but the brilliant geneticistShe came "out of his head!" The metaphor looks clear. Go to L'homme OGM who created this wonderful creature. Because it is still thanks to herGo to Notre Père Prométhée and to La beauté de Pandora that man has the divine light within him.

Some may consider that in an article speaking of Kant, praising the goddess Athena is quite irrelevant. Others have already forgotten that this is an article on Kant. Those who came here only for a particular image do not care about Athena or Kant. As for the last ones, who follow me with confidence, they know that if the road winds, it is because the slope is steep. They know that sooner or later they will be able to see the entire landscape, still hidden by the bends. Beneath his air of false robot, Kant was a man.

As such, he can, as every one of us, choose his destiny. He may focus on a particular aspect, such as logical thinking for Kant, to the detriment of all others. For all men do not take advantage of the wonderful gift of Athena. How many of them are blinkered? How many of them do, as Emmanuel Kant, the same journey from home to work every day of their lives, at the same time? Those ones would not know what to do with a soul, if by chance they found one inside them.

Kant studied at the School of Königsberg, and then at the university of Königsberg, which is in the same buildings, before becoming a professor of this university, what means, all his life, he has traveled the same route every morning and evening, with such a regularity that people set their watches when they saw him: "Here is Mr. Kant already! It is six five!" Twice, however, he missed the ritual: in 1762 at the time of the publication of the Social Contract, by Jean-Jacques RousseauHe loved this author and could obtain a copy of his masterpiece which he devoured and thirty years later, in 1792, on the day of the victory of the French army at ValmyWhich was a heavy defeat for Prussians and their allies

This great thinker, though entrenched in an ivory tower of loneliness and logic, was yet a moralist. Through this way, a shy glimmer of soul shines at the bottom of his heart. This could explain why Kant said :

"There are two indisputable things,

the starry sky above my head

and morals in my heart"