For the Christians, and perhaps also for the others, Jesus is the face of unconditional love, the image of the Linked who connects to the others by the power of his own link, or the one who unties. His historical existence is anecdotal.

His physical body is of little importance, even if the mystery of his face remains quite disturbing.

Several authorsAs Michael Baygent, J-Cl. Devictor… think that Jesus is a composite hero, nourished by many influences and many prophets of that time. There were indeed a large number of them in the first century, around the Mediterranean Sea, and perhaps elsewhere. A crazy movie echoed it, the Monthy Python's Life of Brian, with a herd of "kings of the Jews"Click + to see "King Of The World" condemned to crucifixion. Joking aside, we only lend to rich people. Yet it happens that so many sequences of Jesus' life are remakes of former traditions.

What Virgin Mother?

Snatch, the cult film of Guy Ritchie, starts with an astonishing sequence: four Jews Ashkenazim enter a jewelry store in Antwerp. For one of them, the Christianity started on a translation error. The Greeks would have confused two Aramaic words, "virgin" and "girl". A virgin who gives birth, it flashes, even if it is just a contradiction. Thus was born the myth of Jesus, son of a virgin. And of Joseph, divine cuckold. Guy Ritchie invented nothing: the ancient history is full of sons of virgins.

And  all their mothers attributed the fatherhood to a god, even if only to avoid the ritual sacrifice of the illegitimate child at his birth. The Roman historian Livy tells the miraculous birth of Romulus and Remus. Miraculous because their mother, Rhea Silvia, was a vestal, the priestess of a god, and so doomed to virginity. This did not prevent her from being the mother of the twin brothers founders of Rome: "either out of good faith, or of elevating a mistake by rejecting it on a god, she attributed to Mars this suspicious fatherhood."

(source)Livy, Roman History

And Gabriel Knew Mary

For this reason, among others, the Protestants emit big doubt about the virginity of Mary, especially as the Gospel of John tells us that Jesus had brothers, one of whom was his older brother, Jacques. Being a virgin after a first child, it is not a miracle, it is a scam. Another thing: Jesus is said son of David. Yet it is through Joseph that he can claim this title. Without Joseph, Jesus is not David's son, but Gabriel's bastard. This archangel, very suspicious indeed,As seen by Fmurrr !! (Opposite drawing) has played a role which is not less.

Nowadays, he would be on the cover of some people magazine with the title: the seducer of little girls. Other times, other customs. On the contrary, the so-called traitor Judas would have only played a role agreed with Jesus, so that the scriptures were done. This was the hardest sacrifice for Judas: he loved Jesus. And even worse, as Georges Brassens would say. The story of the thirty silver coins, the price of his treachery, is indicative of Judas' remorse. Finally, in despair, he hung himself, what supports this thesis.

Let's get back to our subject :

A Puzzle Called Jesus

Osiris,See page Christ of the Atlanteans, or Prometheus,See Notre Père Prométhée Christ of the Greeks, are models that may have been used to form Jesus Christ, not to mention Enki,See page Christ of Sumer, or Viracocha,See page Christ of the Andes, or Manu,See page Christ of India, or many others. Of course, some texts seem to testify the historical reality of a character called Jesus, or rather Yeshua Bar Yosef. But these texts are all of Christian origin, written and compiled by Christian activists, who were working for the good of the future generations.

They did not hesitate to adorn their stories, to embellish them with achievements or wonderful events borrowed from more ancient traditions, in short "to make" all the features of the massive composite character that the Christian churches now offer us by the name of Jesus of Nazareth. Which is the first historical mistake. At the time of Jesus' birth, the town of Nazareth was not yet founded. Beside, according to the best-known Christmas tale, the gospel nativity, Jesus was not born in Nazareth, but in Bethlehem in a barn.

How come ? No surprise, says the gospel.  There was a population census in Judea at that time, his parents had to leave Nazareth to be registered in their hometown. En route, they stopped in Bethlehem to spend the night, but it was full everywhere. Of course, the whole Judea was on the roads for the census. The fable seems credible. Except that the meticulous Roman records show no trace of a census in those years. Another wrong detail, and a new stroke in the myth.

Yeshua bar Yosef

 Still worse, the Roman records do not mention the killing of a person called Yeshua bar Yosef, Jesus' official civil status. For some theologians, this story is based on a mistake.Another one! Yeshua belonged to the Nazarene sect, the Gnostics hardliners, under the guidance of a certain Yacoub, St. Jacques in the gospels, Yeshua's elder brother. What can we think about the elder brother of a virgin's son?  "This is part of the mystery." The question is how this word Nazorene became Nazarean in all the modern versions of the gospels.

It is quite simple indeed. When the monks copyists have read Nazarene in the Coptic version, as they were unaware of the sect in question, they changed it into Nazarean, better known by their readers. So they had to justify Jesus' birth in Bethlehem. That is why they invented the story of a census. Anyway, it was necessary that Yeshua was not born in his home, in order to set the beautiful image of the manger and the shepherds, borrowed to a former Mesopotamian tradition. (source)Another fine treasure revealed by Assyrian source.

Though false, the image of a rise in poverty is consistent with the character of Yeshua. In the Gospel of Thomas, the narrator insists on the deprivation of Rabbi Yeshua, who had not even a stone on which to lay his head. Rabbi Yeshua, that the French version translated by Master Jesus, means in fact Rabbi Jesus. But in the Jewish tradition, no one can be rabbi if he is not married. Well, then! Was Jesus married? This is more than likely.  The gospels told us the complete story of a wedding that could well be Jesus' wedding.

The Wedding Of Cana

The wedding of Cana, first act in the Public Life of Jesus, seems to be the sanitized version of a bigger event, more decisive. During the wedding feast, his mother asks him to do something because the wine will soon miss. Who cares about these domestic details, apart the hostess? And when Jesus went into the kitchen to turn water into wine, why do they let him fiddle in drinks? Because he is the hero of the feast, the husband. Another puzzling detail is when the guests congratulate Mary, mother of Jesus, for the quality of the wine that was served at the end of the meal.

In fact, we don't know precisely who was congratulated. Mary ? Or Joseph ? The gospel do not undertake, the householder is mentioned without specifying his name. The wedding of Cana, although modified by copyists, still look like the wedding of Jesus with Mary Magdalene. This is on this breezy thought that Michael Baigent started an extensive investigation, exciting and documented on the marriage of Jesus and his eventual descent. This book, already old, called The Sacred Enigma, explain how the three Mary, the mother, the aunt and the wife of Jesus, were forced to flee Palestine and sail.

The Three Marys

They were landing at Saintes-Maries de la Mer,The town was called after them, says the legend from where they reached the Sainte-Baume range, then a hermitage in Rennes-le-Château, where Miriam Magdalene gave birth to the son of Jesus. Subsequently, the son grew up, married, had himself an offspring who would reign over France after the king Meroveus, the Merovingian dynasty. The story was popularized by a successful author under the name Da Vinci Code. And the genuine fairy tale turned into cat-soup. A pity.

After this first masterpiece, Baigent did not stop his researches: "The Gospel of Judas presents a unique theological position: like many other Gnostic texts, he explains that the god creator is not the true God,See Usurpers that the world is infested with evil and that we must leave it without regret at the time of death. The resurrection of the body was a horrible idea in the eyes of the Gnostics. Moreover, according to them, this is neither the death nor the resurrection of Jesus that humankind owes its salvation."  (source)

A Secret Knowledge

Really? This is not what we are usually told. So what do we owe our salvation? Well "Jesus has revealed a secret knowledge." This is the key to our salvation, say the Gnostics. What knowledge? Stupid question. If the knowledge is secret, no one obviously knows clearly what it is about. Still everyone would like to know the secret of the secret knowledge. If it is possible? Yes sure, we come to the point. As usual, the clue is hidden in the texts themselves.

The Gospel of Judas and that of Thomas share a precious quality: the authenticity. As they have just been discovered in the desert sands, hopefully they had no time to be spoiled by the priests. We can not say the same about the canonical gospels, which have suffered a lot of insults, over the councils and the theological movements of the Roman Catholic and unscrupulous Church. The Nag Hammadi texts have a double freshness, that of their origin, since some texts date from the first century, and that, stripping, of gnosis.

It reveals a Rabbi Yeshua fascinating of complexity, the antithesis to the Saint-Sulpice's iconography of a Jesus pink and blue, flanked by chubby cherubs and bleating sheeps. The Gnostics would have vomited him, they who see the world infested with evil and so unworthy of our regrets. The world, maybe, but what about all our beloved ones over there? The Gnostic view recalls another one, that of Sakya Muni also called the Buddha, that son of a Hindu Raja who made the show five centuries before Jesus.

Sakya Muni

Born very fortunate, brilliantly educated, fed and clothed, Sakya Muni got rid of all that to walk the road with his pilgrim's stick. Under a fig tree, all of a sudden, the awakening stroke him. Enlightenment like a lightning!See page At that very moment, he realized that he had wasted his time. Like the Gnostics, he sees that life is a valley of tears, a sea of pain, and that one must detach from it without regret. Old refrain in all sects. But the demiurge story is more original and deserves attention.

For the Gnostics, our creator is not the true god. Man was created by a false god. An apprentice sorcerer. A demiurge, as they say in these cases. Is it the reason that makes this Earth a valley of tears? Is the demiurge the devil? Is he committed to our destruction, or worse? In your opinion? We stumble on a theological issue. If the devil made us, he is not evil, since there is good in man. So if the demiurge is not the devil, who is he exactly? A sub-god? A divine hard-worker in search of independence?

The Demiurge

Or simply a developped man, a talented geneticist, who merely tinkered his own DNA to give birth to a fragile creature, with a short life, so short that he called us the ephemerals.That is the name Zeus gave to humans. See La création des hommes and La beauté de Pandora "God created man in His image." In this case, God is a man like you and me. Man is a god who does not know he is. There is no difference in nature between god and man, just a difference of degree. That is the secret of Jesus. This is his salutatory revelation. This is why he called himself son of Man.

How God became a man if he was already one? It does not matter anyhow. Jesus knew all that, he was Gnostic like his brother Jacques, all these stories had no secret for him. The Book of Enoch was his bedtime book. What? You did not know Jesus had a brother? He even had several, including Jacques, who was the big bossHe was also the secret leader of the esoteric church. See L'histoire intérieure of the Nazorenes, a Gnostic sect that grouped extremist hardliners. The Nazorenes wanted to clean the Augean stables of the corrupted Sanhedrin.Chiefs of Hebraic religion of that time

The Secret of Enoch

But let's get back to the bedtime book of Jesus, ie the Book of Enoch. It talks of the demiurge, ElohimVoir les sept Elohim the creators, "males and females, from heaven" who created Adam in their image. In the land of Eden. With their DNA. Eden, Adam, DNA.Lost in translation : ADN in french. It's closer. To know more about that, read Le sexe des anges  And the saga goes on. When Jesus speaks of his Father in heaven, whom does he speak about? The demiurge or the true god. The demiurge has created the car, not the driver. The demiurge made the body, as a prince of the  matter.Who is the real boss on earth. Read "Le Roi du Monde" by clicking +

But the light of the spirit existed before the creator. By giving life to a bio-manipulated body, he could not prevent the eternal soul from slipping in it. Thus, in the myth of Prometheus,See Notre Père Prométhée when he shapes us into clay, Athena intervenesSee L'Adam grec and adds a soul. That is why we get a divine nature, though created by a demiurge, and not by the Living One. On the other hand, who created the demiurge himself, if not the Living One ? When the mountaintop is reached, who cares of the valley ?

Between God and man,

there is just a difference of degree.

In the Andes, the day after tomorrow in the morning, will appear a gentle man, kind, who will heal the sick ones, who will divert men from bloodshed. He will be called Tiki Viracocha the Second.See Le christ des Andes He will show people of that time how to do without their cars. One is not born to be a pilot, will he tell them. One does not serve the car. No demiurge has made our soul. Our spirit is uncreated. The light is eternal. Our current appearance is contingent, only the lightSee Vaincre la peur is necessary.