"According to an old Indian legend,See L'étoile bleue Kachina there are thirteen ancient crystal skulls, the size of human skulls, with articulated jaws, which one tells they speakSee Pierre mémoire or sing.See La Roche aux Fées

These skulls are supposed to contain important informationsSee Le secret des grandes pierres about the origins of mankind, its purpose and destiny, as well as answers to some of the great mysteries of life and of the universe.

They assure that this information is not only important for the future of our planet, but essential for the survivalVoir La fin des âges of mankind.

Some day, if we believe these ancestral prophecies,Voir L'histoire d'avant l'histoire all the crystal skulls will be rediscovered and brought together so that mankind may reach their collective wisdom. At first we have to evolve, in order not to abuse this great knowledge. There are variations of this legend in the assets of several Indian tribes, from the descendants of the Mayas and the AztecsSee Les plumes du serpent of Central America to the Indians Pueblos and Navajos, in what is now the southwestern United States, and even up to the North-East, among the Cherokees and the Senecas.

The Cherokee version of the legend says there are twelve planets in the universe inhabited by humans and there is a skull for each of these planets, plus a thirteenth skullClick + essential to all these worlds."  (source)Chris Morton and Ceri Louise Thomas, The Crystal Skulls Mystery

Naturally, some scientists refuse to believe in what they take for bullshit. "As a scientist, I find it hard to believe that people, oh sorry, creatures from other worlds have come here to deposit things before disappearing without attending to us. These assumptions are simply out of realm of possibility", said Jack Kusters.

Would he confuse possible and preferable? Who said that these people have disappeared? Has M. Kusters never heard of UFOs and extraterrestrials, or does he consider that these phenomena also "are out of realm of possibility"?

Yes, he does: "I do not believe in the existence of extraterrestrials, and I must therefore conclude that the skull has been fashioned by the hand of man." This is a not a scientific reaction. The skull has been fashioned by the hand of man, there is no doubt about it.

The question is: where did he come from, that particular man? Why not from elsewhere? Anyway, the a priori, the prior convictions kill science. To form more fertile hypothesis, the only way to perfect knowledge, some minds must be enlarged.

By dint of distrusting the power of Dreams,Click + Jack Kusters express rigidity and flimsiness, two disqualifying errors for science. His beliefs are certainly respectable. But by definition, any belief is out of the field of science.

There is no difference between the personal convictions of Kusters and the religious beliefs of the biblical creationists,Or even worse : the Raelians. See page who give the man an age of only 7,000 years.

The paradox is stated by quantum physics: at a certain scale, the world is just the will of the world. Where there are nothing more than energy, space and time, the mind is the only one creator. The real question is: "And it works up to what scale? The human scale?"

Why not? What you do want, God wants it, and the universe makes it. Each of us can become a god.See Devenir des dieux The program is made for it. The matrix itself can not opposing it. Then go!

Of course, on the way our proto-history unfolded, the author of this site has deep convictions and intuitions that could be called beliefs.See Croire sans y croire Let us note that he only uses them to construct hypotheses.

"To believe or not doesn't matter,

the point is to ask the most questions."

Bernard Werber

Once you have understood the trick, you will take over. Keep questioning, this is too early for the answers: "All the religions are right in what they affirm, and wrong in what they deny." Science is among them.

"Science without conscience

is but ruin of soul"

Rabelais.Lisez Ruine de l'âme

Being a scientist is neither an easy way to promote personal views or creeds, nor an excuse to follow the pack. Too many scientists are taking for science a bunch of old-fashioned beliefs, confusing objectivity and opinion. Lies are they better than truth?

"Two men looked through the bars of their prison.

One saw mud and the other saw stars."

Idries Shah

Science without consciousness? This is a main discipline which swaps its rigor for a catechism, a whole heap of superstitions and prejudices that belong more to the field of psychoanalysis than to that of science.

These creeds are unfortunately part of the conceptual material of most western scientists, most often unaware. They would better revise DescartesSee L'excès rationaliste and his famous methodological doubt ...