![\"\"](\"https:\/\/eden-saga.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/adam-reptilien-jungle-serpent-sk23-1200x720-1.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Killing old Adam<\/em> is a Christian expression that means replacing Adam<\/a> with Jesus<\/a>. Going from the Old Testament to the New. This restrictive interpretation has discouraged unbelievers who understand it in the sense of a makeover. So they say: to kill the old man. <\/em>But there is a third meaning. <\/p>\n If the historical existence of Jesus is called into question by mythologists like John Lamb Lash<\/a> and myself, the existence of Adam, or better to say the Adams<\/a>, is obvious. But evidence does not make a certainty. Certainly, it took a first man, or a first people of clones. But is there still a trace of this divine program in the present man? Is it worth killing Adam if he\u2019s already been dead for so long?<\/p>\n Evangelical discourse is imbued with good feelings, discordant piety and redundant pity. But what does it bring to the revelation of truth? To kill old Adam would only be to take Jesus as a model? To extend the left cheek when slapping your right cheek? Suffer the torment to redeem the sins of others? A character like Jesus hardly fits with the Essene faith, the lessons of Gnosis, and the mentality of the time, that of an invaded people, dominated by more powerful, victim of contempt and injustice as the Hebrew people has always been. In a word, Jesus is a Jew seen by Christians.<\/p>\n Give to Caesar what is to Caesar, and to God what is to God, said Jesus. In such an atmosphere of oppression, this soothing discourse seems strange. One would expect a rebellious christ, instead of this mystical lamb. The Gnostic tablets of Nag Hammadi<\/a> are the oldest documents on which the various narratives of the current New Testament are based. Now we discover a very different redeemer. His name is not Jesus, but XS.<\/a>I precise: XS means Kristos and not Xavier S\u00e9guin.<\/span><\/p>\n Killing old Adam<\/em> can be interpreted differently: replacing the old Adam with the new. As R.A. Boulay points out in his book The reptilian past of humanity<\/em>, there were two Adams, two very different Adamite peoples. Old Adam lived on Hyperborea<\/a>. He was reptilian<\/a>, covered in scales, which is why Genesis tells they were naked in paradise, Eve and him.<\/p>\n “According to the Haggadah, the bodies of Adam and Eve had scaly skin. Adam\u2019s skin “was as bright at night as by day and covered his body like a luminous garment.” Adam therefore had the appearance of a reptile with his scaly and shiny skin. For this reason Adam and Eve did not wear clothing as protection or comfort.”<\/em> (source)<\/a>R.A. Boulay, The Reptilian Past of Humanity<\/em> There were two Adams as there were two distinct periods at the origin of our species. Before and after the fall. Before the fall, reptilian humanoids lived, not on Earth, but 200 km above the North Pole, in a reptilian mother ship from the Great Dipper<\/a>, which the Bible calls the terrestrial paradise, and following Plato, I call Hyperborea<\/a>. But this wandering planet has carried more than one name<\/a>.<\/p>\n “Genesis also says that the Adamites did not sweat before the fall. This was their punishment for eating the forbidden fruit, for then they said to him, “You shall earn your bread by the sweat of your brow.” Before the fall, Adam did not sweat. Perspiration is characteristic of mammals, not reptiles.” (source)<\/a>R.A. Boulay, The Reptilian Past of Humanity<\/span> <\/p>\n As long as they remained in the Garden of Eden<\/a>, another name of the earthly paradise, the Adamites did not procreate. Sumerian tables explain why: they were like mules, unable to reproduce. The incident that the Bible calls “the fall of Man<\/em>” was to acquire the ability to reproduce, adopting more mammalian traits. This is made explicit when it is said that Eve must now undergo the pains of childbirth like all mammals.\u00a0(source)<\/a>R.A. Boulay, The Reptilian Past of Humanity<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n The fall of man is interpreted as a metaphor. Christianity takes it in a symbolic sense: it sees it as a moral fall. I disagree. There is no symbolism in the original texts. This smoking discipline is recent, and as useful as a cautery on a wooden leg.<\/p>\n The symbol is what is left when genuine reality is forgotten<\/em>, said Lao Surlam, pit of science, treasure of scholarship, pillar of wisdom, Himalaya of humility. I precise: Lao Surlam<\/em> is a pseudonym. At his request his identity must remain thoroughly secret.<\/p>\n Don\u2019t be afraid of the world, my friend. The world should be afraid of you.<\/p>
\n<\/span><\/p>\nWhat Certainty?<\/h4>\n
\nThe Two Adam<\/h4>\n
\n<\/span><\/p>\n
\n<\/em><\/p>\nThe Fall<\/h4>\n