{"id":62277,"date":"2026-05-30T05:00:53","date_gmt":"2026-05-30T04:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/eden-saga.com\/en\/?p=62277"},"modified":"2026-05-30T07:25:16","modified_gmt":"2026-05-30T06:25:16","slug":"christ-imperator-constantine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eden-saga.com\/en\/christ-imperator-constantine.html","title":{"rendered":"Christ Imperator Constantine"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00a0In 324 or 1078 AUC<\/a>ab urbe condita, after the founding of Rome<\/span> Constantine sets up his capital in the East in the city of Byzantium, which was renamed Constantinople. In 325 or 1079 AUC the council of Nicaea takes place. And the almighty emperor chooses as a symbol the ancient Celtic cross, the chrism<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Undefeated Sun<\/h4>\n

The Council of Nicaea is the true beginning of a new religion. That of Jesus? No. That of Constantine.<\/strong><\/p>\n

“According to tradition, at the end of this council, Constantine and his new church (from the Latin ecclesia = assembly) assimilated the monotheistic principles of the Manicheans and the Christians to the cult of Sol Invictus and created the new religion (from the Latin religio = respect, worship, veneration). Not that of Jesus but that of the Christ-Emperor, son of the one god.<\/em><\/p>\n

“The Christian religion became Christianized and thus became a Greek religion, o christianismos, that is to say a cult of Constantine, the only representative of the One God in his Empire in the process of unification.<\/em><\/p>\n

It reminded scholars of the cult to the glory of Alexander the Great.”<\/em> (source)<\/a>According to the site \u00abCritical history of Roman Christianity\u00bb.<\/span><\/p>\n

In fact the Council of Nicaea, that is to say the assembly of the Emperor, establishes the new official dogma of the empire: the cult of Christ-Emperor in replacement of that of Mithra Sol Invictus<\/a>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Aesus Mithra<\/h4>\n

I have known wood mysteries and holes of worship! Here, without going so far, in the temple of Lanleff dedicated to Aesus Mithra. Circular and with a high vibratory rate\u2014which is extremely rare for the Gallo-Roman period. The future initiates hurried there in large numbers as they approached Beltaine. With the light shining forth from nowhere, we don\u2019t know where. Magnificent!<\/p>\n

This Jesus, someone invented him from scratch by borrowing elements here and there, in the so-called pagan religions of Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Far East. I don\u2019t think it was Constantine who simply deposed Mithra and replaced Sol Invictus with Christianity, the cult of the savior.<\/p>\n

Whether the invention of Jesus dates from Constantine Christ or is closer to us, it remains a pure invention, borrowed from one end to the other. Too many details show this, and several serious blunders attest to it. I review them in my articles on the Jesus affair. See the links below.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\nLanleff<\/h4>\n

There is in Brittany, in the C\u00f4tes d’Armor, a charming village called Lanleff. There is a curious temple, attributed to the Romans. Circular in shape with massive pillars, semicircular arches and a gallery that was covered, this building is reminiscent of Roman architecture. It is said that this temple was not dedicated to a Roman god, but to Mithra. On one of the pillars, a very worn bas-relief lets glimpse a young boy who could well be Mithra.<\/p>\n

Imagine that in this same village, at another time, the father of the emperor Constantine would have been in garrison. Would this small temple on which historians are drying be the missing link between Roman art and Romanesque art? Everything is possible in Celtic land, sacred land. And Armorica is my garden.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/h5>\n

 <\/p>\n

Houses of the Emperor<\/h4>\n

The construction of basilicas, the houses of the Emperor dedicated to Christ, but also serving as a court, place of commerce, walks, assembly, etc. are multiplying throughout the empire. One curiosity to note: Eusebius of Caesarea, through his “Life of Constantine” contributed greatly to the deification of him who until the end of the Roman period of the Middle Ages (12th century) was honored by the faithful as the founder of the Catholic Church.<\/em><\/p>\n

Many Romanesque churches, in Poitou Charente, Alpes de Provence etc., carry above their porches or in front of the narthex, through which the crowds circulated, imposing equestrian statues called “Constantines”. (source)<\/a>the site “Critical History of Roman Christianity”<\/span> Constantine would thus be honoured by the Christian Church for nearly 800 years!<\/em><\/p>\n

Is it not rather obvious that the Romanesque churches were dedicated to Constantine because they were built at his time?”<\/em>
\nMore here<\/a><\/p>\n

Indeed, it is common sense.<\/strong> <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"Gutenberg Changes the Game<\/h4>\n

I affirm that the cross of Chrism has nothing to do with the cross of Calvary<\/a>. I also affirm that Constantine did not have to invent Jesus the Hebrew.<\/p>\n

This fictional character came much later, when Constantine the Roman was forgotten by peoples who had nothing left of Roman and kept a very bad memory of their ancestors subject to the whims of the Empire.<\/p>\n

As soon as Jesus was invented, thousands of servile monks began to calligraph a new version of Christianity.<\/a>see below<\/span><\/p>\n

This one has survived since Gutenberg invented the printing press.<\/p>\n

The printing age marked the end of ecclesiastical rigging.<\/p>\n

Thank you dear Gutenberg. Good mountain, in German. Too difficult to climb by the priests.<\/p>\n

The first book that came out of his press is also the Holy Bible in Latin, according to the vulgate.<\/p>\n

It is called the Gutenberg Bible or B42 because the pages had 42 lines.<\/p>\n

We have only about fifty copies, how precious.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Copyist Monks<\/h4>\n

Before Gutemberg and the invention of printing, books were hand-calligraphed by armies of copyist monks whose main activity was this. The superior of the monastery had a good game dictating what they should write.<\/a> And the few reluctant monks were tortured by inquisitors, thrown in the butts of low pits, or strangled by the executioner of the place.<\/p>\n

The monasteries were used as town halls, prefectures, police stations, courts and even as places for public strikes. The monks were city sergeants, hawkers, tax collectors for the denier of the cult, informers, secret agents, etc. In fact they cumulated all the functions assigned to educated people.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Obedience was part of their monastic vows. Feet and fists bound by their sacred oath, they were under the orders of the superior father of the monastery, who acted as lord of the village. And when there was a feudal lord, he had to be content with crumbs. In exchange for the title of very Christian lord, he paid an annual tribute of a considerable amount, often paid in land and leases that came to enlarge the property of the monastery.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The all-powerful Church\"\"<\/h4>\n

All the pieces of the puzzle are now put together. The Christ figure that this puzzle shows us is not that, totally imaginary, of a Jesus who did not exist.<\/p>\n

The first Christ of the new Christianity was a Roman emperor; unwittingly, millions still worship him. And in churches, it is before him that they kneel.<\/p>\n

Obviously, we are still living under the rule of Rome, and in many ways.<\/p>\n

Henry VIII understood this very well when he founded the Anglican religion, a Catholicism without Rome.<\/p>\n

Since then, the Anglican pope has been the monarch of the United Kingdom.<\/p>\n

I understand that this demonstration may shock those who still care about this (too) beautiful story. It\u2019s time to grow up.<\/p>\n

The truth is not good to hear, many have died from having said it.\u00a0<\/p>\n

One could object to me the concordance of all the writings attesting to the existence, holiness, and divinity of Jesus. But this concordance is an illusion.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Law of Lies<\/h4>\n

How can we suppose for a moment that the Roman texts, already lying, were transmitted unharmed? All documents were shredded, stained, distorted, censored, modified, cut and tripped with each new copy.<\/p>\n

One need only refer to the beautiful book by Italian scholar Umberto Eco, Il nome della Rosa<\/em>, from which film adaptations have been made. Eco shows how fragile the truth was, and how lying and cheating were widespread in these all-powerful monasteries.\u00a0<\/p>\n

All professions depended on the generosity of the church. Still had to show white paw, pledge allegiance, all swallow even the most gross lies. Confession was a relentless weapon to penetrate the best kept secrets. It is however a malicious invention of which we will find no trace in the Bible or the gospels. The torture of the Holy Inquisition is not included either…<\/p>\n

It is the same in all religions. These demonic inventions have only one purpose: to divert the righteous man from a path of honor and goodness. Religions do not connect us as their name suggests, they separate us and increase hatred. Admitting it should be enough to turn away from them.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

By This Sign You Will Overcome<\/h4>\n

28 October 312: Battle of the Milvian Bridge – Roman Emperor Constantine defeats his rival Maxentius on the Milvian Bridge three kilometers from Rome. Legend has it that Constantine had a vision of a cross in the sky shortly before the battle where it was written in Greek “en tout\u00f4 nika”, “triumph by this.” This apparition incited the monarch to place chrisms on the shields of his soldiers to protect them. The victory against Maxentius comforts him in his idea. From then on, Constantine chooses to defend Christianity.<\/p>\n

No, the great emperor did not choose to defend Christianity, which was then a cult of mystery close to Sol Invictus. Constantine decides to invent a new version in which he would be the savior, the Christ, the Pope, the living God.<\/p>\n

The cross he saw is not that of the crucified. It is the Celtic cross with four equal branches, which represents Hyperborea and its four districts.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

And this Celtic cross like the Chrism are a representation of Hyperborea and its four districts. Hyperborea, the great ark of the covenant levitating above the North Pole. Hyperborea, the Unconquered Sun that Constantine saw in a dream — or in real life? In front of this magnificent presence with an unbearable brilliance, in front of this impressive mass suspended in the air by divine magic, Constantin saw. Constantine believed. Constantine thought he was the chosen one.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\nThe Celtic cross and the chrism represent the four rivers of Hyperborea on the horizontal plane, and the P of the North Pole is the vertical axis that holds this cross in space. Is the weathercock above inspired by it? I don\u2019t know. Still, its shape is perfect to represent the great vessel of the former gods. From which many religions have come.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Jesus Case<\/h2>\n