{"id":9375,"date":"2023-11-08T05:00:20","date_gmt":"2023-11-08T04:00:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/eden-saga.com\/en\/origins-descent-of-man-mythologies-religions-oblivion-law-of-amnesia-memory-barrier.html"},"modified":"2024-05-17T19:55:49","modified_gmt":"2024-05-17T18:55:49","slug":"origins-descent-of-man-mythologies-religions-oblivion-law-of-amnesia-memory-barrier","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eden-saga.com\/en\/origins-descent-of-man-mythologies-religions-oblivion-law-of-amnesia-memory-barrier.html","title":{"rendered":"The Law Of Oblivion"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Who is the man? Where does he come from? We\u2019ve been asking ourselves the question for a long time – which proves that no one knows. There is in our past a wall of memory beyond which no one wants to venture…. Yet these questions are enough to build all wisdom. Knowing where you come from means better understanding where you are and already guessing where you are going. Our forgotten history can shed light on our true nature, also forgotten.<\/span><\/p>\n

\nGropingly<\/h4>\n

We are over-trained, but mostly deformed. Fed with lies, we are groping, not knowing where we come from or where we are going. “Humanity has forgotten its origin: it is like any piece of furniture, unable to say what is its original forest!” (source)<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

Like the waves in the sea or the strata on the rock, civilizations follow one another, tirelessly identical, and overlap one another. Dwarves that we are, especially our historians: very clever who will see further than the previous civilization<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n

It\u2019s as if we have amnesia. And there\u2019s every indication that amnesia is benefiting some. At the end of the known past is an impassable horizon for our mind, the wall of memory. It varies according to the times. On the other side of the wall, there is nothing. The history of the peoples was devoured by the law<\/p>\n

The present historical horizon stops around 900 B.C. – whether we write Jesus Christ<\/a> or Julius Caesar<\/a>, they are almost contemporary. Before? Savages<\/a>, carved stone and cave paintings, no interest. Before? Close relatives of the monkey, if we believe anthropologists, only approved specialists.<\/p>\n

Reputed scientific and therefore indisputable, their scenario is as follows: we are one of the last hominids of the type Homo sapiens<\/a>, the last, a little more conscious than the others, since they call us Homo sapiens sapiens, the man who knows that he knows<\/em>. Our name was changed a few years ago to Homo sapiens. But the scenario of our origin has not changed. And this scenario may not be as solid as science claims.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Charles Darwin<\/h4>\n

Throughout the evolutionary stages, too many links are missing, too many inexplicable jumps suggest too many mutations and too many accidents do things too well.\u00a0 In a word, it is too much for everyone, except for the disciples of Darwin who never have enough. We must see them clinging to this closely mechanistic thesis that is Darwinian evolution. A pattern too rigid and full of holes that even Charles Darwin, at the end of his life, wanted to remove from his work and libraries. The flatterers and groupies of the master prevented it…<\/p>\n

Now and in the past, anthropologists cling to their chimeras. They struggle like flies in a glass of milk. But with their white coat, if they want to be distinguished, it is better to choose to drown in a glass of wine. In any case, they are not ready to drown in anything but their pride. This defect is always a sign of ignorance.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Pierre Teilhard<\/h4>\n

This does not prevent neo-darwinians (like neo-freudians in another field) from considering themselves useful to the progress of knowledge. A retro progress, in this case. At any cost, in the illusory hope of making a bridge between the monkey and us, the neo-Darwinians<\/a> have cobbled together ancestors, Homo erectus, Homo faber and some other hairy plantigrades like the Homo Pekinensis, a blunder of youth committed by the great Teilhard de Chardin.<\/p>\n

Despite the combined efforts of experts for over a century, this bridge was never built. The link is still missing. On the other hand, the paleoanthropologists have found us cousins, the Neanderthals<\/a>, who are claimed missing, what is discussed: where did the yetis come from? Where did we come from?\u00a0<\/p>\n

Where do I come from? Where do I go? I can tell you. I come from home and I’m going back.<\/p>