The greatest mystery of Jesus is him. Did he really live his holy history in Judea? Was he born around year 01? Was he born in Nazareth? Did he have his place in history? None of this appears certain. His very existence is highly questioned by the ancient texts.
“This Jesus seems to have made little or no impression on his contemporaries. No literate of his time mentioned him in all the known texts. The Gospels were not written in his time, nor by those who knew him physically“ writes Barbara Walker in her book “The Woman’s Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets” p.
And I agree with his meaning. The historical existence of Jesus is, for Barbara Walker as for me, more than hypothetical: imaginary. When she speaks of “those who knew him physically” namely the twelve apostles and some disciples, she supports this statement by showing that they also left no trace in the texts of the time.
The thesis she develops there is 100% mine. We join herself and myself in the current of the myth of the lost Eden: monotheisms came to supplant a neolithic religion centered on the veneration of a great goddess.
There is much to be said about the very principle of monotheism, an obvious absurdity. The gods are countless, like humans or any living species. The one god is an aberration, as is the eternal being. The Great Goddess is at least 4 billion years old. But she will die too. Everything that lives dies. Not everything that dies will live in a hypothetical beyond…
According to Barbara G. Walker, contemporary religious symbols would have been diverted from their original meaning relative to this ancient matriarchal religion and reinterpreted in the light of patriarchy, so as to minimize the “feminine principle”. I am again completely of his opinion.
The holy books were composed after the establishment of the church, some until the 2nd century AD, or even later, according to the needs of the church. Most scholars believe that the first book of the New Testament is the Letter to the Thessalonians, written perhaps in 51 AD by Paul, who never saw Jesus in person and therefore did not know the details of his life. (source)www.bible.chez-alice.fr: “The Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets”, by Barbara Walker, p. 471,
That’s something to think about! These texts are written by people without presence in books, registers or others. Paul himself, who would have started by torturing the Christians, converted and became one of the pillars — the first undoubtedly — of neo-Christianism. I say neo-Christianity because there has existed since Isis, Ama, and all the mother goddesses who watched over very ancient cities. The Christianity of Jesus should rather be called Jesuism. Because it takes over an extremely ancient title, that of Christ. Barbara Walker makes this statement, peremptory and without appeal:
“What do the pagan authors of the time of Jesus say about him? Nothing. As surprising as it may seem, there is no mention of Jesus by these pagan contemporaries. There is no trace of birth, transcript of trials, death certificate. There is not the slightest expression of interest, no calumnies, no past references, nothing. Even in the entire first century, there is almost no reference to Jesus by a non-Jewish or non-Christian source.” (Professor Bart Ehrman, University of North Carolina)
The few references that can be found do not date from the first century, they were added long after in certain documents of the time by the hands of the copyists themselves, all Christian monks, let us not forget it. The brilliant work by Umberto Eco, The Name of the Rose, and the fabulous film that was taken from it demonstrate and dismantle this perverse mechanism. The superiors of convents and monasteries had no difficulty in censoring, deleting, crossing out, correcting, modifying and adding anything they wished.
So? How and when did the fable of Jesus come into being? The gospels are all sacerdotal forgeries written more than a century after their alleged dates. wrote Joseph Wheless in his book ‘Counterfeiting in Christianity’.
As a lawyer, Joseph Wheless (1868-1950) defended free and atheist American organizations.
Writer convinced of Jesus-is-a-myth, he served as an advisor for several American free thinking organizations and defended numerous cases involving questions of atheism.
According to Wheless, not only has no one called Jesus ever lived, but Christianity and the Bible are based on deliberate fraud; the continued existence of Christianity is a conspiracy using persecution and oppression to perpetuate itself, to enslave people.
The temples of the ancient pagan gods were true splendors, of great wealth and even greater beauty. The Temple of Diana in Ephesus, the
Parthenon or the Temple of the Goddess-Virgin in Athens, were the wonders of the ancient world. The greatest ruins of antiquity are the temples of the pagan gods, testifying in their dilapidated grandeur to an unparalleled magnificence. (Joseph Wheless, “Counterfeiting in Christianity”).
Those who invented some of the “alternative” gospels and epistles even admitted that they had forged the documents. Counterfeiting during the first centuries of the church’s existence was manifestly rampant, so common in fact that a new phrase was coined to describe it: “Pious fraud.”
Such deception is frequently admitted in the Catholic Encyclopedia. Some of the “great” fathers of the church, such as Eusebius, were recognized by their own peers as incredible liars who regularly wrote their own fictions about what “the Lord” had said and done during “his” alleged stay on earth.
The Crusaders did not find Nazareth in 1090 and it was the Knights of the Cross who, in the thirteenth century, founded the village of Nazareth.
As Édouard Dujardin rightly points out, Pauline literature “makes no mention of Pilate, nor of the Romans, nor of Caiaphas, nor of the Sanhedrin, nor of Herod, nor of Judas, nor of the ‘holy’ women, nor of any of the characters in the Gospel account of the passion, and on this one she never makes the slightest allusion; ultimately, it mentions absolutely none of the ‘events’ of the passion, directly or by allusion.” (Ancient History of the God Jesus, by Édouard Dujardin, p. 33)
Édouard Dujardin (1861-1949) novelist, supports the myth of Jesus inventing it by listing countless examples of bad faith and pious inventions.
«From now on, we no longer know Jesus Christ as a man
but as a sign, a principle.» (II Corinthians V, 17)
Pierre Geoltrain adds in 2002: “No one would dare anymore, nowadays, to write a life of Jesus like those that came into being in the 19th century. Imagination then supplemented the silence of sources […]. As for the opposite undertaking, as for the theses of the mythologists who, faced with the difficulties encountered by the historian, thought to solve them all by explaining the Gospels as a solar myth or a purely symbolic sacred drama, it does not resist analysis. The study of the Gospels allows us to say, not only that Jesus existed, but even much more.
Yes. That a character of this caliber existed, no one can deny it. But it is the historical Jesus that is at issue. And there, it is necessary to recognize that we are indeed in a dead end. I easily recognize the existence of Esus to whom I devoted a documented article.
Several scholars question the historical existence of Jesus. That of Christ, on the other hand, is not questioned. And for good reason! This title is ancient: Prometheus, Orpheus, Dionysus, Apollo, Rama, Esus, Mithra… Multiple Christs have ruled the world since the dawn of time, long before Roman times.
Lucifer Christ
The Christ Prometheus
Orpheus Christ
The Christ Dionysus
Mithras the Christ
Two Christianisms
Christianism and Mithraism
The Christ Seth
Osiris the Christ
Apollo Christ
Aesus Christus
Krishna the Christ
The Christ Rama
Come on, thanks to Oui-qui-paie-dia, let’s give ourselves a good little onomastics touch. The Scolies of Bern, an ancient and medieval commentary (between the fourth and ninth centuries AD) by the Pharsalia of Lucan assimilate him to the Roman god Mars, or Mercury, and specify that Aesus was appeased by suspending a man from a tree until, as a result of the shedding of his blood, he let his members go.
The name of Aesus is an element of the Gaulish proper names Esunertos (“he who has the strength of Esus”) and Esugenos (“born of Esus” or “well-born”, equivalent to Eugene in Greek). According to Joseph Vendryes, the name “Esugenos” is found in Welsh in the form of Owain and in Irish in Eogain. It is found in Breton, particularly in the forms Yves, Erwann and Youenn, according to Canon F. Falc’Hun. Julius Pokorny adds the Welsh Ywein, which became Yvain in medieval French literature. (source)
The god Aesus, deemed cruel, is none other than the good Saint Yves of the Bretons. He was not a saint in the Christian sense of the term, because he lived long before the appearance of the religion of Jesus. No matter. The first names Yves, Yvon, come from him. The Russian name Ivan can be read IV AHN in golden language, namely YV the ancestor. The Breton towns of Yvignac la Tour, Yffignac and Yvias are dedicated to him. All three located in the Côtes d’Armor.
Several clues show that the cult of Mithras did not spread from Iran to the Celtic lands, but that it is the cult of Esus who left Celtia to reach Iran. In the Côtes d’Armor again, the village of Lanleff and its circular temple characteristic of the Mithraic cult. This little gem of a temple seems to date back to before the Roman conquest.
Besides, voluntary or not, a street sign from this same town indicates the fate of the Catholic church and its improbable Jesus…
It is around the year 150 of our era and according to the needs of the controversy, that one writes in the gospels, the stories of the earthly life of a Jesus very different from “the purely celestial being only known” before the year 150 of our era.
“We know from time immemorial how much this fable of Christ
has benefited us and our loved ones.”
[Quantum nobis nostrisque ea de Christo fabula profuerit,
satis est omnibus seculis notum. ]
The high Catholic hierarchy does not believe in the history of Christ
but uses this legend to convert the masses.
Upon his enthronement,
each new pope receives this astounding revelation
Lord Jesus never existed.
There were so many Christs before him, why invent Jesus? Here is the story. At the Council of Nicaea, the emperor Constantine had proclaimed himself Christ. Another one! He covered Europe and the empire of Romanesque churches and Gothic cathedrals.
After his death, everything that was Roman became hateable for the people. The Romanesque churches, innumerable, and the Gothic cathedrals built for an old cult to a hated emperor. Brigands without faith or law were pillaging the countryside and places of prayer. They could not remain empty, nor the people without a guide. The legates of the Roman Catholic church gathered in Avignon for a council of last resort. Among them was a brilliant philosopher and great scholar, Thomas from Aquinas.
It was this Thomas who had the idea of a Jewish prophet. It was also Thomas who proposed the name of Jesus that was to flourish.
Thus began the greatest enterprise of falsification in our history, which has nevertheless experienced many and tasty ones. And the first popes are therefore those of Avignon…
The emperor Constantine was the true Christ. Later, the Roman legates invented Jesus. Here is the continuation of the story.
At the beginning, there were the Romanesque churches, innumerable, and the Gothic cathedrals built for an old cult to a forgotten emperor. There were lawless brigands who looted the countryside.
The solution, sublime in its simplicity, was the invention of sweet Jesus, the only one capable of filling churches, and subduing brigands.
But before the great plague, there was this Christ-Emperor so penetrated by his glory that he had thousands of sublime temples erected, with an efficiency and a beauty that still move the crowds.
Without Heliogabalus the illuminated, would we have known a fool of the calibre of Constantine? It’s doubtful. They are both the symbols of hubris, the excess that seizes Rome.
If you feel like praying to the composite character who was called Jesus, rather than feeding an egregore,see below give him his name: at Christmas pray to little Mithras, at Easter pray to Enoch and on the feast of Christ the King, you better pray to Christ Imperator Constantine.
All the signs are there, one can read them. The church invented, yet Jewish by Jesus, is especially Roman by Paul, the true founder. But still, inventing Jesus, what a nerve! Especially since everyone believed in it and still believes in it. It is increasingly easier, because the enormous faith of all believers has created an egregore, a soul-group that responds to the name and qualities of Jesus as we represent him. Know that by praying to Jesus, you invoke an egregore, a psychic entity, a demon, a daimon would have said Socrates.
These so-called egregore entities are parasites that feed on our energy and/or emotions.
But fear nothing: most often, your prayer will be received and answered by your inner master, who is your immortal soul, emanation of the Source.
No, my friends, fear nothing, the Serpent has only made your body of flesh, you are much more, three people in one, you are divine. Let’s stop believing that the Serpent is the devil. For the Serpent is within us as well: don’t we have a reptilian brain? And the kundalini that unfolds along the spine during awakening, isn’t it called the fire serpent?
Jesus was a perfect man, wrote A. J. Cronin, but Confucius was funnier. It is true that Jesus does not make too much humor. Except once: “I tell you that you are Peter, and on this stone I will build my Church.” (source)Matthew 16, 17 Fabulous pun, bravo Jesus! Let’s see what this fabulous pun gives in English, for example? ” Now I say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church. In Latin, it’s hardly better: Petrus and petra, it approaches but we’re not there. Note that in Greek the pun works less well than in French. Let’s not talk about the Coptic, the language that Jesus was supposed to speak: in this language, this play on words is not conceivable…
Everything happens as if Jesus had spoken in French, say so! In no other language does the wordplay work. What’s the point of little Jesus getting worked up? More seriously, it is not surprising that the play on words only works in French, because it was first written in vernacular French before being translated into Greek by St. Thomas Aquinas himself, who was one of the inventors of Jesus.
(Old nursery rhyme)On the bridge of Avignon, they are dancing all round
Louis Aragon had a profound influence on the teenager that I was ... and that…
Our distractions come from a double view and testify to our double life in two…
The map of Piri Reis is an old, Portulan-style map discovered in 1929... and recently…
There is no time, no space, science says. And despite that, the Unique has split,…
It was a time of innocence, of justice, of abundance, long life and happiness
Before us, the fire was already shining. After us, it will not be extinguished. In…